I look forward to challenging exchanges, witty insights, and learning others' perspectives. Thanks for initiating this forum, Natasha
I like the the idea. Longevity is gaining momentum. I have been in the field for last ten years and I can see increase in popularity of it rising every year. Many popular "longevity" things nowadays talk about healthy habits (food, sport, sleep). That's why I find this project very valuable because it says clearly that we wish to abolish the death (as it is involuntary in great majority of cases).
Best regards, Martin
Antimortality is an online forum and community for those, who refuse to sign the consent for aging and death as a desired outcome.
We use reason, science and action to cooperate on reduction of mortality of all causes for every human on the planet. And, being honest, for pets too.
We write here because movement needs memory, arguments, maps. We need places where confused newcomer can become useful faster, and where useful people can stop rediscovering same ideas alone.
We need this forum so each day we can act against death more and more efficiently.
If you are interested to know why this forum exists and why we need something separate from LessWrong, Effective Altruism, X, private Slacks, local chats and occasional camps - start with Why Antimortality Should Not Exist.
The Home
The idea is old: death is not a sacred law, but an ultimate evil, that can be addressed technically, medically and socially.
Versions of this idea have reappeared again and again:
The problem is that the idea keeps reinventing itself without enough memory. Instead of one hundred people making one hundred disconnected explainers, we can build shared texts that improve over time. Let's make the idea to persist and help it to obtain a shape, by building the consensus here and transmitting it among everyone, who refuses to die without giving a fight to death.
This is a place to write essays, comment on essays, chain essays together, link arguments, improve old posts, challenge weak claims, canonize useful texts, and build something like a shared intellectual memory for the refusal of death.
We highly recommend you to read essays, and leave the comment after each essay that you've read, and write your own essays to make our philosophy stronger.
The Vibe
Here is not a cult of optimism, not a cult of hype and not a place to surrender.
A place where people can disagree about almost everything, as long as they agree that:
That is enough to begin.
Hint! Read the Forum Rules, before you craft and post a text here!
The View
Antimortality exists to make the whole field visible at once. A geroscientist, cryonicist, sideloader, neuroscientist, doctor, patient, investor, philosopher, engineer, policy person, and student should be able to recognize that they are not working on unrelated islands.
The Gate
Most people who are sympathetic to life extension do not know what to do next. They may like the idea, but they do not yet have an identity, a map, a community, or a path from sympathy to contribution.
This forum also exists to help any newcomer from any place on Earth to self-onboard and quickly understand the full state-of-the-art in the field: the philosophy, the science, the technologies, the policies, the organizations, the open problems, the traps, the live hypothesis and the possible roles they can play.
Antimortality should help to convert sympathy into identity and action.
The Plan
Antimortality exists to canonize demands to governments and institutions. If aging kills almost everyone, then policy should not treat it as a niche hobby.
The Ladder
People start from something small. That is fine. The important thing is that there is a next step.
The ladder looks something like this:
Why Antimortality?
Because the word names the direction. First comes refusal. Then comes orientation. And then comes the action. Also, because Antimortality does not mean certainty of victory.